Two identical bars of eutectoid steel (0.83% carbon) are heated to 800 °C. Bar 1 is then quenched in water. Bar 2 is cooled slowly inside the furnace.
Explain how the cooling rate affects the microstructure and the mechanical properties of each bar.
[4 marks] b)Bar 1 is to be used as a punch in a metal fabrication workshop. Explain why Bar 1 is tempered before it is used.
[2 marks]Both bars start as austenite at 800 °C. Watch each cooling curve and the microstructure it leaves behind, then watch Bar 1 go back into the heat to be tempered.
The cooling rate decides the structure. Fast cooling traps the carbon as martensite. Slow cooling lets it form layers of pearlite.
Each route starts from austenite at 800 °C. Choose one to see its cooling curve, and the microstructure and properties it leaves.
Four marks in a) for a structure and a property for each bar, and two in b) for what tempering does and why the punch needs it. Try each sentence yourself before you reveal it.
Water quenching cools Bar 1 so rapidly that the carbon does not have time to diffuse out of the austenite, so the austenite transforms into martensite, with carbon trapped in a distorted iron lattice.
You name martensite for the quenched bar and you give the reason: there is no time for the carbon to diffuse out of the austenite. The name without the reason is only half of what the marker looks for.
For the first mark, accept ‘carbon is trapped in the iron lattice’ or ‘there is no time for pearlite to form’.
Do not accept pearlite, bainite or cementite as the structure of Bar 1.
Marker: identifies that water quenching (rapid cooling) forms martensite, because the carbon does not have time to diffuse out of the austenite
Martensite is very hard but brittle, so Bar 1 resists wear but cracks under impact.
You state that martensite is very hard but brittle. The question asks about mechanical properties as well as microstructure, so each bar needs its properties, and here both halves count: hard, and brittle.
Marker: identifies that martensite is very hard but brittle
Furnace cooling is slow, so at 723 °C the austenite has time to transform into coarse pearlite (alternating layers of ferrite and cementite).
You link the slow furnace cooling to the austenite transforming into coarse pearlite. Slow cooling is the cause and pearlite is the effect, so say both.
For Bar 2, accept pearlite, or layers of ferrite and cementite. ‘Coarse’ is not required.
A sketch of the microstructures may support the response but is not required.
Marker: identifies that furnace cooling (slow cooling) allows the austenite to transform into coarse pearlite
Coarse pearlite is softer and more ductile and tougher than martensite, so Bar 2 can bend and absorb impact without cracking.
You compare pearlite with martensite: softer, more ductile, tougher. The comparison with Bar 1 is what earns the mark, so write “than martensite”.
Or other suitable response consistent with a reasonable understanding.
Marker: identifies that coarse pearlite is softer and more ductile (or tougher) than martensite
Untempered martensite is too brittle for a punch, which is struck repeatedly. Bar 1 is reheated to a temperature below 723 °C (about 200 to 300 °C), so some carbon leaves the distorted lattice and tempered martensite forms.
You say that Bar 1 is reheated below 723 °C (about 200 to 300 °C) and that tempered martensite forms. Both the temperature limit and the new structure are in the mark.
A specific tempering temperature is not required. Accept any stated temperature from 150–650 °C.
Marker: identifies that tempering reheats the quenched steel to a temperature below 723 °C to form tempered martensite
This increases toughness (reduces brittleness) for a small loss of hardness, so the punch stays hard enough to cut metal but withstands repeated impact without shattering.
You say toughness goes up and brittleness goes down for a small loss of hardness, and you link it to the punch surviving impact. The link to the punch is what makes it an explanation.
Accept ‘relieves internal stresses’ as part of the second mark only when it is linked to reduced brittleness or increased toughness.
Allow FT marks for errors in part a).
Or other suitable response consistent with a reasonable understanding.
Marker: explains appropriately using wording that indicates tempering increases toughness (reduces brittleness) for a small loss of hardness, so the punch can withstand impact without shattering
a) Water quenching cools Bar 1 so rapidly that the carbon does not have time to diffuse out of the austenite, so the austenite transforms into martensite, with carbon trapped in a distorted iron lattice.a) Mark 1 Martensite is very hard but brittle, so Bar 1 resists wear but cracks under impact.a) Mark 2
Furnace cooling is slow, so at 723 °C the austenite has time to transform into coarse pearlite (alternating layers of ferrite and cementite).a) Mark 3 Coarse pearlite is softer and more ductile and tougher than martensite, so Bar 2 can bend and absorb impact without cracking.a) Mark 4
b) Untempered martensite is too brittle for a punch, which is struck repeatedly. Bar 1 is reheated to a temperature below 723 °C (about 200 to 300 °C), so some carbon leaves the distorted lattice and tempered martensite forms.b) Mark 1 This increases toughness (reduces brittleness) for a small loss of hardness, so the punch stays hard enough to cut metal but withstands repeated impact without shattering.b) Mark 2
No past QCAA question tests heat treatment, so compare the structure of the question instead.
Only mark this done when you could do it without help. Reading the solution does not count.
A Tangent Tuition mock exam question. It is not a past QCAA question, and Tangent Tuition is not affiliated with the QCAA.
Spot a mistake on this page? Report it